2008 Honda Accord EX-L V6 rear brakes:
#1
2008 Honda Accord EX-L V6 rear brakes:
I have been reading that there are many problems with the rear brakes reaching their life by 15,000 miles. If this is true, then what is Honda doing about it? If they are not doing anything about it what can we do as owners to improve the life of these pads and rotors? Should I buy slotted rotors, better pads, etc? If you buy slotted rotors, can they be shaved or are you SOL when/if they warp? Do Accords still need to have their rotors shaved on the car? My '96 was this way, but not sure about the '08's. Keep in mind that this is a family car and I am looking for long life quality parts and limited maintenance.
Thank you.
Rick
Thank you.
Rick
#2
Well, typically performance rotors (dimpled/slotted/drilled) are going to wear pads faster. I'm not sure if they can be resurfaced... I don't see why they can't.
I believe Honda adjusted the rear side of the combination valve to brake harder so the front end doesn't dive as much while braking. Without getting too involved in tinkering with the system, I would suggest learning how to change the pads yourself. They're a lot easier to service and they are not captured rotors like 97 and older Accords.
Typically, unless the pedal is pulsing, rotors don't need resurfacing and these days it's cheap enough to just replace them if they are pulsing.
I would suggest moving to a different pad than OEM. At our shop we typically use Napa's AdaptiveOne pads and our customers like them a lot. They are a bit spendy though, usually $50-100 a pair, but hopefully they'll last longer.
If that's more than you want to spend, semimetallic or ceramic pads wear slower than low metal organic or organic pads.
I believe Honda adjusted the rear side of the combination valve to brake harder so the front end doesn't dive as much while braking. Without getting too involved in tinkering with the system, I would suggest learning how to change the pads yourself. They're a lot easier to service and they are not captured rotors like 97 and older Accords.
Typically, unless the pedal is pulsing, rotors don't need resurfacing and these days it's cheap enough to just replace them if they are pulsing.
I would suggest moving to a different pad than OEM. At our shop we typically use Napa's AdaptiveOne pads and our customers like them a lot. They are a bit spendy though, usually $50-100 a pair, but hopefully they'll last longer.
If that's more than you want to spend, semimetallic or ceramic pads wear slower than low metal organic or organic pads.
#3
Thank you.
Well, typically performance rotors (dimpled/slotted/drilled) are going to wear pads faster. I'm not sure if they can be resurfaced... I don't see why they can't.
I believe Honda adjusted the rear side of the combination valve to brake harder so the front end doesn't dive as much while braking. Without getting too involved in tinkering with the system, I would suggest learning how to change the pads yourself. They're a lot easier to service and they are not captured rotors like 97 and older Accords.
Typically, unless the pedal is pulsing, rotors don't need resurfacing and these days it's cheap enough to just replace them if they are pulsing.
I would suggest moving to a different pad than OEM. At our shop we typically use Napa's AdaptiveOne pads and our customers like them a lot. They are a bit spendy though, usually $50-100 a pair, but hopefully they'll last longer.
If that's more than you want to spend, semimetallic or ceramic pads wear slower than low metal organic or organic pads.
I believe Honda adjusted the rear side of the combination valve to brake harder so the front end doesn't dive as much while braking. Without getting too involved in tinkering with the system, I would suggest learning how to change the pads yourself. They're a lot easier to service and they are not captured rotors like 97 and older Accords.
Typically, unless the pedal is pulsing, rotors don't need resurfacing and these days it's cheap enough to just replace them if they are pulsing.
I would suggest moving to a different pad than OEM. At our shop we typically use Napa's AdaptiveOne pads and our customers like them a lot. They are a bit spendy though, usually $50-100 a pair, but hopefully they'll last longer.
If that's more than you want to spend, semimetallic or ceramic pads wear slower than low metal organic or organic pads.
Thank you again.
Rick
#5
I think faster than normal. I looked yesterday and I'd have to say that they're about 40% worn at only 18,000. I will just put an after market high quality pad on there because there is no pulse in the brakes so rotors are fine at this point.
#6
Like Finch said, slotted rotors would wear the pads faster. Seems like most car companies have been playing all kinds of games with brake pad material since asbestos was outlawed.
Softer pads make too much dust.
Harder pads are more likely to squeal.
Metallic pads wear down the rotors too fast.
There doesn't seem to be a universal magic material that's good for everything.
I've become a big fan of Hawk HPS pads after putting them on a couple cars now.
With moderate DIY skills, it's pretty easy to change brake pads. We can talk you through it.
Softer pads make too much dust.
Harder pads are more likely to squeal.
Metallic pads wear down the rotors too fast.
There doesn't seem to be a universal magic material that's good for everything.
I've become a big fan of Hawk HPS pads after putting them on a couple cars now.
With moderate DIY skills, it's pretty easy to change brake pads. We can talk you through it.
#7
Thank you.
Like Finch said, slotted rotors would wear the pads faster. Seems like most car companies have been playing all kinds of games with brake pad material since asbestos was outlawed.
Softer pads make too much dust.
Harder pads are more likely to squeal.
Metallic pads wear down the rotors too fast.
There doesn't seem to be a universal magic material that's good for everything.
I've become a big fan of Hawk HPS pads after putting them on a couple cars now.
With moderate DIY skills, it's pretty easy to change brake pads. We can talk you through it.
Softer pads make too much dust.
Harder pads are more likely to squeal.
Metallic pads wear down the rotors too fast.
There doesn't seem to be a universal magic material that's good for everything.
I've become a big fan of Hawk HPS pads after putting them on a couple cars now.
With moderate DIY skills, it's pretty easy to change brake pads. We can talk you through it.
#8
I've heard good things about EBC pads, just never used them.
They won't be much different than the 96 Accord. You probably already know about twisting the pistons in the rear calipers. And the front rotors will be much easier since they're not trapped by the hubs.
Another reason for rear brake wear... With stability control, the car will be using the rear brakes one at a time during "spirited" driving.
They won't be much different than the 96 Accord. You probably already know about twisting the pistons in the rear calipers. And the front rotors will be much easier since they're not trapped by the hubs.
Another reason for rear brake wear... With stability control, the car will be using the rear brakes one at a time during "spirited" driving.
#9
that would put it between 40-50k miles for the life of the pads ,, that is about average ..
#10
I have a 2008 Accord LX 2.4 and I am about to put my second set of pads on the rear. The car has 50K miles on it and I am very disappointed with the performance of the pads. When I put the first set on the rear aftermarket pads were not even available at the time the only place I could find them was at the dealer. With all the negative publicity Toyota is enduring at the time it sure would be nice for Honda to step up and address this problem.