SRI or CAI?
#2
04-07-2008 | 03:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 110
From:
RE: SRI or CAI?
MPG will probably go down regardless of SRI or CAI. CAI offers more HP, but it's probably not even noticeable. I'd personally go with a SRI, just cause theres a chance of ruining your engine if you hit a puddle with a CAI on.
Do a search in the forums. THere's been a million different threads on this.
Do a search in the forums. THere's been a million different threads on this.
#3
04-07-2008 | 04:25 PM
Been Around A Long Time Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,213
From: Wayne, NJ
RE: SRI or CAI?
^ he's being conservative. Last time Jon counted, it was a bajillion or so! But then again,Mississippi guys can't really count right unless they're wearing sandals. [sm=badbadbad.gif]
#6
04-07-2008 | 09:19 PM
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 31
From:
RE: SRI or CAI?
ORIGINAL: atarikid07
MPG will probably go down regardless of SRI or CAI. CAI offers more HP, but it's probably not even noticeable. I'd personally go with a SRI, just cause theres a chance of ruining your engine if you hit a puddle with a CAI on.
Do a search in the forums. THere's been a million different threads on this.
MPG will probably go down regardless of SRI or CAI. CAI offers more HP, but it's probably not even noticeable. I'd personally go with a SRI, just cause theres a chance of ruining your engine if you hit a puddle with a CAI on.
Do a search in the forums. THere's been a million different threads on this.
#7
04-08-2008 | 07:24 PM
Been Around A Long Time Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,381
From: St. Paul, MN
RE: SRI or CAI?
ORIGINAL: HondaPinoy
Just like you said CAI will probably offer more HP. and thats exactly what im looking for. MORE HP!! haha i could care less of how hard it is to install i just want a faster car. know what i mean? so so u still go with SRI for speed purposes?
ORIGINAL: atarikid07
MPG will probably go down regardless of SRI or CAI. CAI offers more HP, but it's probably not even noticeable. I'd personally go with a SRI, just cause theres a chance of ruining your engine if you hit a puddle with a CAI on.
Do a search in the forums. THere's been a million different threads on this.
MPG will probably go down regardless of SRI or CAI. CAI offers more HP, but it's probably not even noticeable. I'd personally go with a SRI, just cause theres a chance of ruining your engine if you hit a puddle with a CAI on.
Do a search in the forums. THere's been a million different threads on this.
#8
04-08-2008 | 09:05 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 110
From:
RE: SRI or CAI?
ORIGINAL: HondaPinoy
Just like you said CAI will probably offer more HP. and thats exactly what im looking for. MORE HP!! haha i could care less of how hard it is to install i just want a faster car. know what i mean? so so u still go with SRI for speed purposes?
ORIGINAL: atarikid07
MPG will probably go down regardless of SRI or CAI. CAI offers more HP, but it's probably not even noticeable. I'd personally go with a SRI, just cause theres a chance of ruining your engine if you hit a puddle with a CAI on.
Do a search in the forums. THere's been a million different threads on this.
MPG will probably go down regardless of SRI or CAI. CAI offers more HP, but it's probably not even noticeable. I'd personally go with a SRI, just cause theres a chance of ruining your engine if you hit a puddle with a CAI on.
Do a search in the forums. THere's been a million different threads on this.
Just like you said CAI will probably offer more HP. and thats exactly what im looking for. MORE HP!! haha i could care less of how hard it is to install i just want a faster car. know what i mean? so so u still go with SRI for speed purposes?
Just go with the SRI. A CAI will only get you like 1 or 2 hp more, tops... Unless you REALLY want that extra horse. Can't stop you there.
