Funny article that a honda hater wrote
#21
12-19-2007, 12:31 PM
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
RE: Funny article that a honda hater wrote
ORIGINAL: finch13
Don't you think since the horse is in front of the carriage it would be a bad idea to Hershey Squirt yourself? And thanks 97 for pointing out the assembly line thing...i dodn't feel like being an @$$ today lol.
Don't you think since the horse is in front of the carriage it would be a bad idea to Hershey Squirt yourself? And thanks 97 for pointing out the assembly line thing...i dodn't feel like being an @$$ today lol.
haha Your welcome!
#25
12-19-2007, 02:16 PM
RE: Funny article that a honda hater wrote
ORIGINAL: 19Accord97
Arent the Accord v6's faster or slower by a milisecond than a Mustang GT? Ive seen videos on YouTube.
Arent the Accord v6's faster or slower by a milisecond than a Mustang GT? Ive seen videos on YouTube.
An 05 or newer mustang GT 0-60 in 5.2. They weigh 3450lbs and have 300 HP and 320 Ft Lbs torque.
06 Honda Accord V6 - the only 0-60 stats I could find were on the V6 sedan - 7.8 seconds. 244 hp and 211 ft lbs torque. they weigh 3371(V6 6spd sedan) or 3303 (V6 6sp coupe)
The only way one could beatthe Mustang is if the Mustang's driver either didn't know how to drive, or simply let the Accord win. The mustang has over 100 more ft lbs of torque and only weighs around 150lbs more.
Falkore, your new avatar is even creepier than the last one
#26
12-19-2007, 02:43 PM
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
RE: Funny article that a honda hater wrote
Check these out. Mustang wins...not by much @ all.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjSxS...eature=related
Accord wins
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0fekzZFmuk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjSxS...eature=related
Accord wins
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0fekzZFmuk
#27
12-19-2007, 02:47 PM
RE: Funny article that a honda hater wrote
ORIGINAL: 00AccordLX5spd
Not a chance if they are stock.
An 05 or newer mustang GT 0-60 in 5.2. They weigh 3450 lbs and have 300 HP and 320 Ft Lbs torque.
06 Honda Accord V6 - the only 0-60 stats I could find were on the V6 sedan - 7.8 seconds. 244 hp and 211 ft lbs torque. they weigh 3371(V6 6spd sedan) or 3303 (V6 6sp coupe)
The only way one could beat the Mustang is if the Mustang's driver either didn't know how to drive, or simply let the Accord win. The mustang has over 100 more ft lbs of torque and only weighs around 150lbs more.
Falkore, your new avatar is even creepier than the last one
ORIGINAL: 19Accord97
Arent the Accord v6's faster or slower by a milisecond than a Mustang GT? Ive seen videos on YouTube.
Arent the Accord v6's faster or slower by a milisecond than a Mustang GT? Ive seen videos on YouTube.
An 05 or newer mustang GT 0-60 in 5.2. They weigh 3450 lbs and have 300 HP and 320 Ft Lbs torque.
06 Honda Accord V6 - the only 0-60 stats I could find were on the V6 sedan - 7.8 seconds. 244 hp and 211 ft lbs torque. they weigh 3371(V6 6spd sedan) or 3303 (V6 6sp coupe)
The only way one could beat the Mustang is if the Mustang's driver either didn't know how to drive, or simply let the Accord win. The mustang has over 100 more ft lbs of torque and only weighs around 150lbs more.
Falkore, your new avatar is even creepier than the last one
http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/Sp...cord&trimid=-1
#29
12-19-2007, 03:49 PM
RE: Funny article that a honda hater wrote
2004 Honda Accord EX Coupe V-6 6 Speed 5.9 14.5
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
2005 Ford Mustang GT V-6 6.9 15.3 (C&D Feb '05)
2005 Ford Mustang GT 4.6L V8 5.1 13.5 (MT Jan '05)
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
2005 Ford Mustang GT V-6 6.9 15.3 (C&D Feb '05)
2005 Ford Mustang GT 4.6L V8 5.1 13.5 (MT Jan '05)
#30
12-19-2007, 04:06 PM
RE: Funny article that a honda hater wrote
I never trust youtube videos. You never know what is accurate. Plus those were 04 or older Mustangs. A V6 accord may be able to hang with them. But I still say the mustang was either an automatic, or the driver didn't know what he was doing. Plus in the second video you can't even tell if it is a GT or a V6 mustang. Also the second video the Mustang driver may not have even been aware he was "racing."
There were plenty of times when I drove my Mustangs that someone would try to run me. I would usually humor them for a minute, but I would always slow down. Therefore they thought they "won" when I wasn't even trying.
Then if you want to talk about mods. Mustangs are WAAAYYY more mod friendly than any Honda. An intake added 10 hp to the Wheels on Horsepower TV. Dyno proven! Flowmaster mufflers only (not even a full cat back) added 12 wheel hp. Imagine what adding full cat back &headers would do. For the money you would spend modding the honda, you could spend the same on the mustang and blow the doors off the honda. Here I go again in one of my mustang rants. I'll shut up now[sm=icon_quiet.gif]
There were plenty of times when I drove my Mustangs that someone would try to run me. I would usually humor them for a minute, but I would always slow down. Therefore they thought they "won" when I wasn't even trying.
Then if you want to talk about mods. Mustangs are WAAAYYY more mod friendly than any Honda. An intake added 10 hp to the Wheels on Horsepower TV. Dyno proven! Flowmaster mufflers only (not even a full cat back) added 12 wheel hp. Imagine what adding full cat back &headers would do. For the money you would spend modding the honda, you could spend the same on the mustang and blow the doors off the honda. Here I go again in one of my mustang rants. I'll shut up now[sm=icon_quiet.gif]