Funny article that a honda hater wrote
#41
12-21-2007, 08:44 AM
RE: Funny article that a honda hater wrote
ORIGINAL: falkore24
LOL .... me too!!!!
ORIGINAL: WheelBrokerAng
I surely agree with you about all this you put in here..100%
ORIGINAL: 00AccordLX5spd
I'll shut up now[sm=icon_quiet.gif]
I'll shut up now[sm=icon_quiet.gif]
#44
12-21-2007, 03:44 PM
RE: Funny article that a honda hater wrote
Video was a 'vert GT and it still beat the v6 Accord.. non-vert GT would still hump the Accord
And if it's v6 it is not a "GT" I don't understand that-- agreed that the Mustang should NO LONGER have a 6banger... that just makes it female friendly [8D]
I love the muscle car movement... T/A WS6 with some loudBUTT** pipes is too exciting to ignore
Old's 442 and Firebirds, oh my!
And if it's v6 it is not a "GT" I don't understand that-- agreed that the Mustang should NO LONGER have a 6banger... that just makes it female friendly [8D]
I love the muscle car movement... T/A WS6 with some loudBUTT** pipes is too exciting to ignore
Old's 442 and Firebirds, oh my!
#45
12-24-2007, 08:40 PM
RE: Funny article that a honda hater wrote
ORIGINAL: 19Accord97
2004 Ford Mustang GT 6.3 14.8
htm
Nothing but trash posts to get your count up is all I see
2004 Ford Mustang GT 6.3 14.8
htm
Nothing but trash posts to get your count up is all I see
I haven't raced a V8 stang but I have taken a 303HP impala by a nose..........lol look on his face.......priceless
#46
12-24-2007, 09:18 PM
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
RE: Funny article that a honda hater wrote
ORIGINAL: 19Accord97
2004 Ford Mustang GT 6.3 14.8
htm
Nothing but trash posts to get your count up is all I see
2004 Ford Mustang GT 6.3 14.8
htm
Nothing but trash posts to get your count up is all I see
uh...... WheelBrokerAng, how was that a trash post? Or my other ones too. I'd really like to know. And why would you edit the Accords times out? How does that even remotely make sense when I am comparing times. Wow
And ah yes, my post count. Thats all i've ever cared about. *sarcastic* Well Heck I Know That ^ but if you look at the post it wasn't directed at you my fellow member 
Sorry if you thought it was...
#47
12-26-2007, 10:53 AM
RE: Funny article that a honda hater wrote
ORIGINAL: YeuEmMaiMai
damn, the mustang would loose the 0-60 race to a standard 2004 TL as 5.7 0-60 and 14.4 through the quarter mile...........that's sad........
damn, the mustang would loose the 0-60 race to a standard 2004 TL as 5.7 0-60 and 14.4 through the quarter mile...........that's sad........
-Original MSRP - $23,675
-Original Invoice Price - $21,677
2004 Acura TL w/6spd MT:
-Original MSRP - $32,650
-Original Invoice Price - $29,755
You get what you pay for.
You couldhave bought the305 HP Mach 1 mustang for the price of the TL.
FYI, MSN shows the TL is slower than that (although they do only show the auto so the Manual trans will be faster): http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/sp...&trimid=-1
Personally I'd buy thebaseMustang GT and save the $8,900. Use that to upgrade the suspension, get better exhault, headers,slap on a supercharger, upgrade the cam, and get some lower gears. And debadge it. Probably still have a few thousand left over if I didthe work myself. When the TL tries to race, smile at him and blow his doors off.
The TL is sexier though
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nubuck83
General Tech Help
1
09-03-2009 09:46 AM
1a9c9c9ord
Off Topic
1
12-12-2007 12:04 AM
1a9c9c9ord
Off Topic
3
08-19-2007 07:55 PM
